|
Depression in Teen
Girls: A Psychologist Comments
|
I
recently read a survey on teenage sexual behavior (National Survey on
Family Growth, 2002), which found that today, overall, sexual behavior is
very similar between boys and girls. Yet as a psychologist with experience
treating adolescents I find that girls tend to experience more mood and
self-esteem problems than boys. During their teen years girls are
more likely to feel depressed, and are more at risk for undervaluing their
self-worth and self-expression. While a gender gap may be closing on
a behavioral level for teenage girls and boys, disparities in mood and
self-confidence exist that reflect what we might call an emotional gender
gap. Why might adolescence be a more emotionally vulnerable period for some
girls?
No
formal announcement celebrates the arrival of puberty. Suddenly able
to bring another person into the world, teens need to balance burgeoning
feelings of independence, interpersonal connection, sexuality,
individuality, responsibility, and intellectual growth; yet, for the most part,
they have not developed the emotional, relational and decision-making
skills to integrate all of the changes and challenges occurring in their
life. Adolescence is generally viewed as a time when teens begin to
sort out and express contradictory feelings about who they are.
I
have found that teenage girls may slip into a depression of various
intensities after a salient loss. Relational betrayals, trouble in school,
interpersonal slights, parental misunderstandings, or subjective feelings
of ineffectiveness are losses that may unleash a reactive or more profound
depressive state. What happens to girls here?
Social
and cultural patterns differ between the sexes. Girls are often pressured
into believing that their physical attractiveness is the sine qua non of
their desirability and success. Sometimes a girl disguises or negates her
real feelings and allows others to decide who she needs to be in relation
to them. One teenage girl said: "Boys try to talk you out of
what you are really experiencing."
In
research with adolescent girls, Tolman and her colleagues (2006) identified
two key experiences that can evoke depression in girls. Girls may
hide and deny authentic thoughts and feelings. And girls may
experience their body as merely an object for other's judgmental gaze and
approval or disapproval. Body objectification and relational
inauthenticity accounted for fifty percent of the depressed mood, and more
than sixty-six percent of the self-devaluation, of the adolescent girls
evidenced in their study.
I
have found that girls may often feel compelled to silence and discount what
they really think or feel in order to sustain connection to and acceptance
by others. One 15 year-old patient told me she felt she had to
"fake it and pretend to enjoy the attention" she was receiving
from boys. Sometimes a girl may feel that her emotional survival is
dependent on playing up to the needs and expectations of others - who may
not always have her best interests at heart - which undermines her ability to
feel interpersonally empowered and strong.
Girls
need opportunities in which to discover and define their silenced
selves. Although some fluctuation in a teen's moods, behavior, and
self-image states is phase appropriate, signs that a girl is veering too
far off may be seen in emotional or behavioral excesses of any kind,
including excessive withdrawal, anger, absenteeism, promiscuity, moodiness,
suicidal ideation, sleeping, irritability, and/or academic decline.
Such excesses are a red flag for parents and teachers to reach out in
supportive and understanding ways. When parents sensitively recognize
and supportively articulate the contradictions that a girl is struggling
with, she may feel very validated and relieved that her real thoughts and
feelings are being taken seriously and understood. If significant
derailments are evident in a girl's lack of well being, psychotherapy may
be something to consider. Efforts such as these by parents and
therapists work to restore a secure, inner base from which to negotiate her
relationships and life.
Sharon
Brennan, Ph.D.
|
|
When Illness Strikes in a Family
|
|
"I used to be strong and independent and everyone relied on me when
they needed something. But now that I'm sick, my children have to take care
of me!" This woman is a mother with two teenaged children, who
now has end-stage renal disease. Her words reveal the way in which one
person's medical illness can disrupt an entire family.
As
a psychologist, I work with the Columbia University medical team treating
people who are on chronic dialysis. Patients often ask me why they need to
meet with a psychologist when there is nothing wrong with them mentally. I
tell them that the only thing truly wrong with them is that they have
failing kidneys, but that having a medical illness is stressful or even
traumatic and that my role is to help them to anticipate and adapt to the
psychological issues that will surely arise.
Life
with a chronic illness is tough for both the sick person and those who are
deeply connected to her. But important psychological experiences often go
unacknowledged - we all defend against scary feelings. In being hidden they
become their own source of anxiety as people try to cope with feelings they
have barely recognized. It is important to tend to the ongoing internal
experiences of everyone in the family so that they are better able to adapt
and work together, so that needless stress is not created, and to create a
level of contentment as individuals.
Patients
and families generally want to be helpful to one another, but when a mother
who has nurtured her children now needs those children to give her
medication, or when a teenager struggling with physical and social problems
must take a back seat to the parent's urgent illness, difficult feelings
arise. Further, when there is a serious illness, patient and family worry
about their own suddenly uncertain future as fears of death loom and need
to be addressed.
One
dialysis patient with a very loving and supportive family confided in me,
with some mixture of anger and despair, his thoughts of killing himself. He
felt he was a burden to his two adult children who shouldered the
responsibility of taking care of him. He wished for his own death, he said,
because he felt his children resented his dependency on them and would be
happier without him. This very proud man felt demeaned in his own eyes and
believed others must feel the same way about him.
Feelings
not addressed often have negative consequences.. Caught up in his own
inner turmoil, this man became irritable and difficult to be around,
refusing to be helped or to go to his doctors' appointments. Although
he did not say so, I sensed that beneath the surface was a lot of
unexpressed rage at the disappointing course his life had taken and the
helplessness that went along with it. Any reminders of his current
decline--doctors, medicine, and caregivers-- he either avoided or attacked.
Thoughts of suicide enabled him to feel he could at least control whether
he lived or died.
His
family did become angry and resentful of him, of course, but not for the
reason he thought. They were angry with him, not because he was sick and
had lost his independence, but for just the opposite reason. They resented
that he refused to accept the reality of his sickness and the fact that he
really did need them. It was not his physical situation but actually his
struggle with his emotional reactions that was the family problem.
Over
time, as he was able to speak about what things were actually like for him,
he was able to tolerate the deeper level of feelings--the sadness and the
anger--that he had been running away from. Being able to finally
mourn and accept the losses he could do nothing about enabled him to take
more control of what he could affect. He came to see that he was making
others feel as angry and as helpless as he was and was making himself much
more of a burden when he rejected their help.
While
difficult, health crises and the disruptions they create can challenge
people to grow and families to become closer. It is at these difficult
times that people discover resources within themselves and within their
families they never knew were there.
Maureen O'Reilly-Landry, Ph.D.
|
|
Adolescent
Withdrawal
|
|
I
am often asked to consult with parents and schools about adolescent issues.
A recurring problem is the sometimes sudden, inexplicable and moody
withdrawal of teens from activities in which they had previously and
characteristically shown a great deal of enthusiasm for social
involvement. While in some kids this might reflect the emergence of a
serious depression, it's common enough to consider it as a normal
developmental condition. When kids show reluctance, disinterest, and
disengagement from activities that we know would enhance their lives, how
do we make sense of this? Parents often describe this type of change
in their teenagers, and tell me that they feel powerless to intervene, both
in their attempts to stir their kids' diminishing interests and to remain
informed about the changing peer groups.
It's
next to impossible to force a teenager to take on interests and activities
outside of their regular academic life. Parents often find themselves
insisting that their adolescents sign up for an after-school club or sport,
but that doesn't guarantee genuine interest, involvement or cooperation on
the teen's part. In fact, it might actually have the reverse effect
and create a more oppositional reaction. This is not uncommon; there
are many adolescents who seem to lack a "passion," or some
interest or endeavor about which they feel unqualified enthusiasm. So
often, I hear parents wish for something, anything that would capture their
child's imagination and energy.
I
would suggest that a lack of passionate interest in an activity or field of
interest in adolescence should not be interpreted automatically as a fault,
a failing, or even as a depression. Kids are flooded during their
high school years with endless variations on the question of "what do
you want to do with your life?" "Where do you want to go to
college?" "What will you be when?" This is
particularly true in academic settings where kids have already demonstrated
promise and talent. Sometimes kids put the brakes on the rush to grow
up. They are not ready to become adults with fully formed notions of
the future and express this by turning down, or even turning off, their
avowed interests and enthusiasm. This is a "good" hedge
against uncertainty, but mostly a temporary solution. Adolescents can
benefit from hearing parents and other adults in their lives make
supportive statements about the kind of future we imagine them
pursuing. What we know about their strengths and past interests might
suggest some general directions. An adolescent's cold ear of seeming
disinterest is not necessarily a deaf ear; kids listen carefully to what
their parents say and they store away adults' visions of them, particularly
the ones that speak of hopefulness and encouragement I sometimes catch wind
of this in adolescents' cynical reports of their parents' insistent
nudging and pushing to do better school work.
Parents
worry as they watch their teens gravitating to new groups of friends about
whom they know little. When this happens, they feel that same sense of
helplessness and marginalization as when they try to encourage outside
activities. Conventional wisdom would suggest that parents find ways to get
to know these other kids better by asking to hear more about them and
inviting them to their homes to "hang out" but many teens might
see hanging out in their parents' presence as the last thing they might
want. I coach parents to read the secondary signs of their teen's
choice of these peers. What effects can be noticed from these recent social
connections? Does hanging out with them lead to a decline in his or her
other responsibilities in school or at home? Does her mood or behavior
change when she gets home?
That
is, are there signs that new social contacts serve a function for greater
independence or, in contrast, greater withdrawal and disinterest. In
adolescence, the peer group reigns supreme and can serve a very important
role in adolescent development, but also can reinforce negative pulls of
disengagement and alienation. Returning to the earlier point about
withdrawal as a defensive stance against the pressures to mature, some kids
cling tenaciously to their prerogative to secrecy about their peers as one
more way to shy away from the pressures and competitiveness of
future-oriented, achievement driven surroundings. They will need a
good deal of patience and gentle coaxing to help them through these early
stages of uncertainty.
In
conclusion, I have tried to expand our appreciation of a more normal
process in which adolescents react to mounting, formidable pressures by
"not knowing" and being unsure, even to the point of decreasing
their previously active interests. Similarly, I've tried to give a
perspective on many parents' concerns about their teen's changing peer
group affiliations and suggested ways in which parents can be supported in
their parental concerns to support their teen's independence while also
remaining vigilant and involved.
Larry
Zelnick, Ph.D.
|
|
About Our Authors
|
Sharon Brennan, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and a psychoanalyst
who has a private practice for adults and adolescents in New York.
Dr. Brennan also supervises and teaches at Maimonides Medical Center and is
an Adjunct Supervisor in the doctoral psychology program at Yeshiva
University. Dr. Brennan is a former President of the New York State
Psychological Association (NYSPA), Chairs NYSPA's Media Ambassador Program,
and is NYSPA's Representative to the American Psychological Association
Council of Representatives.
Maureen O'Reilly-Landry, Ph.D., is a Clinical Psychologist and
psychoanalyst at the Psychiatry Consultation-Liason Service at Columbia
University Medical Center, New York. She is co-author with Ellen Luborsky
and Jacob Arlow of the revised chapter on psychoanalysis in Corsini and
Wedding's Current Psychotherapies, published in 2008. She maintains
a private practice in psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, and family therapy, in
New York City.
Larry Zelnick, Psy.D., is a member of the Division of Psychoanalysis of
NYSPA and also serves on the Board of the Division of Psychoanalysis of the
American Psychological Association (APA). He is Adjunct Professor at Long
Island University's Doctoral Psychology program and teaches and supervises
at several institutes of psychoanalytic training in New York City. He
works in private practice with children, teens and adults and has led
workshops for parents in schools in New York for more than twenty years.
His publications include: "The Computer and the Therapist as
Objects of Play", and "Confronting Deadness in Dissociation: A
Relational Perspective on the Treatment of an Adolescent", both
published in the Journal of Infant , Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
in 2005.
|
|
Susan B. Parlow, Ph.D., Editor in Chief;
Sharon Brennan, Ph.D., Issue Editor
Roanne Barnett, Ph.D., Don Grief, Ph.D., Maureen O'Reilly-Landry, Ph.D.,
Nicholas Samstag, Ph.D., Janet Tintner, Ph.D., Editorial Board;
NYSPA, Division of Psychoanalysis
With special thanks to the Psychoanalytic Society of the Post Doctoral
Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis at NYU, for initial funding.
|
|